Stock Chart Patterns: A Practical Guide to Reading, Validating, and

Gold Trading Software: What It Includes, How to Choose It, and How to: A common problem is that traders search for a single “best” gold trading software without first defining what they actually need. The term covers several.

Overview

Stock chart patterns are recognizable price formations, such as triangles, flags, or head-and-shoulders shapes, that traders use in technical analysis to judge whether a stock's trend is likely to continue, reverse, or stall. Their value depends on how strictly you define, confirm, and risk-manage each one, not on the shape alone.

This guide walks through what stock chart patterns are, how the main categories differ, and how to read the most common formations with consistent criteria rather than guesswork. It also covers a repeatable way to validate a pattern before acting on it, the reasons patterns fail even when they look textbook, and a simple workflow for scanning, documenting, and reviewing setups. The goal is not to promise that any pattern predicts price with certainty. It is to help you use pattern recognition as one disciplined input inside a broader trading process, alongside trend context, volume, and, where relevant, the news or macro backdrop that can override a clean-looking chart.

What stock chart patterns are

A stock chart pattern is a visual record of the push and pull between buyers and sellers as price moves over time. Modern technical analysis around these formations traces back at least to Richard Schabacker, who published Technical Analysis and Stock Market Profits in 1932, according to Moomoo's overview of chart pattern history. Patterns compress trend direction, support and resistance interaction, and shifts in buying or selling pressure into a shape you can label, but a shape is a description of what already happened, not a guarantee of what happens next. Treating a pattern as a probability worth weighing, rather than a signal worth trusting blindly, is the mindset this guide builds toward.

Consider a hypothetical stock, ABC Corp, trading between $48 support and $52 resistance for six weeks after a prior uptrend from $35 to $52. Price tests $52 three times without closing above it, then on a fourth attempt closes at $53.10 on volume roughly 40% above its recent average. A trader watching this setup would treat the six-week range of $48 to $52 as the pattern's boundary, the close above $52 as the trigger, and the volume expansion as one confirmation input. A common way to project a target from a range breakout like this is the measured move: take the height of the range ($52 minus $48, or $4) and add it to the breakout point, which points toward roughly $56. Just as important, the trader would define invalidation before entering, for example a close back below $52, since that would mean the breakout failed and the range is probably still intact. This single example shows why a pattern's boundary, trigger, confirmation, and invalidation level all need to be specified together. A shape alone, without those four pieces, is not a tradable setup.

Chart patterns, price patterns, and technical analysis

"Stock chart patterns," "chart patterns," and "price patterns" describe largely the same idea: recurring shapes in price history that technical analysts use to interpret trend behavior. Stock chart patterns are widely described as the basis of technical analysis, according to Moomoo's educational overview, because nearly every other technical concept, trendlines, support and resistance, moving averages, builds on the same price history that forms these shapes. The distinction between the terms is mostly about scope. "Chart pattern" is the broader technical-analysis term that can apply to any tradable instrument, while "stock chart patterns" narrows the same concept to equities specifically, where earnings dates, sector behavior, and single-stock liquidity add context that a purely geometric reading misses.

Why support, resistance, and trendlines come first

Nearly every stock chart pattern is built from three simpler ideas: trend direction, support, and resistance. A trendline is formed when a minimum of two points on a price chart are connected by a line, according to Moomoo, and most patterns are really just specific arrangements of two or more trendlines drawn from swing highs and lows. Support functions as a temporary floor where sellers stop selling and buyers regain control, while resistance is the opposite, a ceiling where a rally stalls and reverses, as Charles Schwab's chart-reading guide explains. A pattern's neckline, boundary, or trendline is really just support or resistance drawn at an angle or at a repeated level. Because of this, learning to read stock chart patterns starts with correctly identifying trend, support, and resistance, not with memorizing every named shape.

The main types of stock chart patterns

Nearly all stock chart patterns fall into one of a small number of broad categories, and understanding which category a pattern belongs to matters more than memorizing its name. There are two major forms of chart patterns, according to Moomoo: continuation patterns, which suggest a pause before the prior trend resumes, and reversal patterns, which suggest the prior trend may be ending. A third group, bilateral patterns, does not predict direction at all and instead flags that a larger move is likely without saying which way it will break. A fourth comparison worth making explicitly is chart patterns versus candlestick patterns, since the two are related but structurally different tools that beginners often blend together.

Continuation patterns

A continuation pattern is a pause in an existing trend that resolves in the same direction the trend was already moving. Common examples include triangles, rectangles, flags, and pennants, all of which suggest a temporary consolidation or pause in an ongoing trend before it resumes, according to TradingComputers' guide to stock chart patterns. Traders generally use these patterns to anticipate that a trend will continue and look for opportunities to add to existing positions rather than to call a brand-new trend into existence. The practical decision point is whether the pattern forms with the trend still intact around it; a "continuation" shape appearing after a trend has already weakened is a weaker signal than the same shape appearing mid-trend.

Reversal patterns

A reversal pattern suggests that a prior trend is losing strength and may change direction. Examples include head and shoulders, double tops, and double bottoms, which suggest the price may reverse its prior trend rather than continue in the same direction, according to TrendSpider's guide to chart patterns. These patterns require a completed prior trend before they mean much: a head and shoulders forming without a clear preceding uptrend is not a meaningful reversal signal, it is just three peaks. Because reversal patterns imply a change in the dominant force behind price, they generally deserve stricter confirmation than continuation patterns before a trader treats the change as real.

Bilateral patterns

A bilateral pattern signals that a significant move is coming without predicting its direction. Bilateral chart patterns let traders know that the price could move either way, meaning the market is potentially volatile around the pattern's resolution, as noted in IG International's overview of common chart patterns. Symmetrical triangles are the clearest example: TrendSpider classifies them as bilateral because they carry insight into an upcoming inflection point rather than a directional bias, while other sources, such as Fidelity's technical-analysis materials, group triangles more generally under multi-bar continuation patterns. That disagreement across sources is itself a useful lesson: some patterns are genuinely more subjective to classify than beginner content implies, and treating a symmetrical triangle as automatically bullish or bearish before it breaks is a common mistake.

Chart patterns versus candlestick patterns

Chart patterns and candlestick patterns are both price-action tools, but they operate at different scales. A stock chart pattern is typically built from many bars or candles over days, weeks, or months, using trendlines, necklines, or horizontal levels drawn across that whole structure. A candlestick pattern, by contrast, is usually a single candle or a small cluster of two or three candles, where the shape of each candle's body and wicks, colored green or red depending on whether the stock closes higher or lower than it opened, according to Schwab, conveys short-term sentiment. In practice, many traders use candlestick patterns for near-term timing confirmation, such as a reversal candle near a chart pattern's boundary, while relying on the larger chart pattern for the broader structural read. Treating the two as interchangeable, or assuming a bullish candlestick automatically confirms a bullish chart pattern, ignores that they are answering different questions at different timeframes.

Stock chart patterns compared by purpose

Because so many pattern names get taught as a flat list, it helps to see the most common formations side by side, organized by what they are generally used for, what confirms them, and where they tend to fail. The table below is a starting reference, not a rulebook; treat the difficulty and invalidation columns as prompts for what to watch, not as fixed probabilities of success.

Read this table as a shortlist for what to check before trusting any single pattern, not as a promise that confirmation guarantees an outcome. The next section walks through each of these formations individually with the criteria that make them identifiable in the first place.

Common stock chart patterns beginners should know

Learning stock chart patterns works better as a sequence than as a flat list of names. Starting with clearly defined, high-frequency formations, then moving to shapes that require more subjective judgment, reduces the odds of misreading noisy price action as a pattern that is not really there. The formations below are grouped roughly in that order, from the more mechanically defined to the more interpretation-dependent.

Head and shoulders

A head and shoulders pattern is composed of three highs, according to CMC Markets' overview of stock chart patterns: a middle peak (the head) that is higher than two surrounding peaks (the shoulders), with a neckline drawn across the troughs between them. It is widely treated as a bearish reversal signal that a prior uptrend is ending. Confirmation typically requires a close below the neckline, and high-volume breakouts are considered far more reliable than low-volume ones at validating a chart pattern's projected move, per TrendSpider's analysis. Because the shoulders and head can look similar to ordinary trend pullbacks before the pattern completes, this formation is easy to label prematurely, so waiting for the neckline break rather than anticipating it is the more disciplined approach.

Inverse head and shoulders

The inverse head and shoulders is the mirror image of the standard pattern: three lows, with a lower middle trough (the head) flanked by two shallower troughs (the shoulders), and a neckline drawn across the peaks between them. It is generally read as a bullish reversal signal after a downtrend, with the trigger being a close back above the neckline. As with its bearish counterpart, the pattern is only informative once it completes; treating the first shallow low as an automatic reversal signal, before a second shoulder or the neckline break confirms it, is a common way traders get ahead of the chart.

Double top and double bottom

A double top pattern generally indicates that a stock's upward trend may not be sustainable, according to CMC Markets, and forms when price tests resistance twice without breaking through. The pattern is typically considered complete only once price breaks below the support level between the two peaks, at which point it is read as a bearish reversal. A double bottom works the same way in reverse: it is complete when price rises and crosses the previous high between the two troughs, per CMC Markets, marking a potential bullish reversal. In both cases, entering before that confirming break is a common source of premature trades, since a second test of the same level does not, by itself, prove the level will hold or fail.

Triangles

Triangles form when two converging trendlines compress price into a narrowing range. A symmetrical triangle is made up of at least two increasingly lower highs and two increasingly higher lows, according to CMC Markets. Ascending triangles, with flat resistance and rising support, are generally read as bullish because the higher lows and tightening price action at resistance suggest bulls are gaining momentum, while descending triangles, with flat support and falling resistance, suggest the opposite as bears gain momentum, according to TrendSpider. Symmetrical triangles are more ambiguous, since they compress price without a clear directional lean, which is why some sources classify them as bilateral rather than continuation patterns. The practical rule across all three variants is the same: wait for a decisive close outside the triangle's boundary, ideally with volume support, rather than guessing the breakout direction from the shape alone.

Flags and pennants

Flags and pennants are short consolidation patterns that follow a sharp, fast price move (the "flagpole"). Pennants form when there is a significant price change followed by a consolidation with converging trend lines as the distance between highs and lows narrows, according to TradingComputers, and traders interpret the eventual breakout direction largely by looking at the trend that preceded the pattern. Flags are structurally similar but consolidate in a parallel channel rather than a converging wedge shape. Because both patterns are short and follow an already-strong move, they tend to be among the more beginner-accessible formations when the surrounding trend is unambiguous, but they lose reliability in choppy markets where there was no clean flagpole to begin with.

Rectangles and trading ranges

A rectangle forms when price bounces repeatedly between a defined support level and a defined resistance level, creating a horizontal trading range. Rectangles are a continuation pattern that shows neither buyers nor sellers hold the upper hand while the range persists, per TradingComputers, though the eventual breakout can go either direction depending on which side ultimately gives way. This makes rectangles bilateral in practice until they resolve, even though they are often taught alongside other continuation patterns. The number of times price has tested each boundary, and whether volume dries up inside the range and expands on the eventual break, are both useful clues for judging whether a rectangle breakout is likely to hold.

Wedges

A rising or falling wedge is a narrowing structure similar to a triangle, but with both trendlines sloping in the same direction rather than one flat and one angled. Wedges appear among the common multi-bar chart patterns covered in Fidelity's technical-analysis materials, alongside triangles and head and shoulders formations. Interpretation depends heavily on trend context: a rising wedge that forms during an uptrend is often read as a bearish reversal signal, while a falling wedge during a downtrend is often read as bullish, though the opposite reading can apply if the wedge appears as a brief pause within a stronger existing trend. Because the slope of a wedge's trendlines is drawn somewhat subjectively, this is a pattern worth treating with extra caution until the breakout is unambiguous.

Cup and handle

A cup and handle pattern combines a rounded, U-shaped base (the cup) with a smaller consolidation dip near the prior high (the handle) before a breakout. It appears among the commonly cited chart patterns in IG International's overview of formations every trader should know, generally as a bullish continuation setup once price clears the handle's resistance. The rounding shape that defines the cup is naturally easier to identify after it has fully formed than while it is still developing, which means clean textbook examples of this pattern are more common in retrospective chart reviews than in live, right-edge-of-the-chart trading decisions.

How to validate a stock chart pattern before acting on it

Recognizing a shape on a chart is not the same as having a tradable setup. A validation framework turns a visual observation into a structured decision by forcing you to define, in order, the context the pattern sits in, its exact boundaries, the event that triggers it, what confirms it, and the point at which you would be proven wrong. Skipping any one of these steps is usually where "the pattern looked right but the trade didn't work" comes from.

A practical sequence for validating any stock chart pattern looks like this:

Precondition: confirm there is an actual prior trend, range, or context for the pattern to sit inside, since a reversal pattern without a trend to reverse is not meaningful.
Boundary: draw the pattern's trendlines, neckline, or horizontal levels using consistent anchor points, such as clear swing highs and lows, rather than whichever points make the shape look cleanest.
Trigger: define the exact price event that completes the pattern, generally a closing price beyond the boundary rather than a brief intraday wick through it.
Confirmation: look for a supporting signal, such as volume expansion on the breakout, a retest of the broken level, or agreement with a moving average.
Invalidation: set, before entry, the price level or condition that would prove the pattern wrong.
Risk and target: size a stop from the invalidation level, and use a defined method, such as the measured move, to set a target rather than an arbitrary number.
Review: record the outcome against your original plan so you can judge whether the pattern held to its own rules, independent of whether the trade made money.

Working through these seven steps in order, rather than jumping straight from "I see a pattern" to "I should trade it," is what separates chart reading from chart-pattern trading.

Confirm the prior trend and market context

A pattern's meaning changes depending on what it interrupts. The same double-top shape means something different appearing after a six-month uptrend than it does appearing in a stock that has been chopping sideways for a year with no clear trend to reverse. Before labeling any formation, check whether price was in a defined uptrend, downtrend, or range beforehand, and whether anything outside the chart, an earnings date, a sector move, a broad market swing, is likely to be driving the current price action instead of the pattern itself. If the context does not support the pattern's implied story, that is a reason to treat the setup with more skepticism, not less.

Draw the pattern boundaries consistently

Subjectivity creeps in most at the boundary-drawing stage. Two traders looking at the same chart can draw a neckline, trendline, or triangle boundary through slightly different anchor points and arrive at different conclusions about whether the pattern has even completed. A useful discipline is to commit to a rule before looking at the chart, such as always anchoring trendlines to the two most recent significant swing highs or lows rather than whichever points happen to fit a preferred narrative. Labeling a formation as complete before its boundary has actually been broken, sometimes called premature pattern-calling, is one of the more common ways traders convince themselves a setup exists when the chart is still ambiguous.

Wait for the trigger, then check confirmation

The trigger is the specific price event, usually a closing price beyond the pattern's boundary, that completes the formation; the confirmation is the supporting evidence that the breakout is more likely to hold. Volume is the most commonly cited confirmation input: the strength of a chart pattern often depends on the number of times price reacted to the trendline and the volume behind those reactions, with high-volume breakouts considered more reliable than low-volume ones, per TrendSpider. Other traders look for a retest of the broken level, agreement with a moving average, or confirmation across a second indicator, but none of these should be treated as a guarantee. Confirmation reduces uncertainty; it does not remove it.

Define invalidation before defining the target

Risk-first planning means identifying the price action that would prove the pattern wrong before spending time projecting how much you could make if it works. In practice, invalidation is usually the level that, if breached, means the breakout failed and the prior structure is probably still intact, such as price falling back below a broken neckline or resistance level. Only after that level is set does it make sense to calculate a target, commonly through a measured-move projection based on the pattern's height, since a target without a defined invalidation point is just a wish, not a plan.

Why stock chart patterns fail

Even a textbook-looking pattern can fail, and understanding why is arguably more useful than memorizing more pattern names. Failures generally trace back to a small set of causes: the breakout reverses quickly, the volume or liquidity behind the move was too thin to sustain it, fresh news overrode the technical setup, or the pattern looked valid on one timeframe while a conflicting structure existed on another. None of these failure modes mean chart patterns are useless; they mean patterns describe probability, not certainty, and the surrounding conditions matter as much as the shape itself.

False breakouts

A false breakout occurs when price closes beyond a pattern's boundary, appears to confirm the setup, and then quickly reverses back inside it. This is more likely when the breakout happens on weak volume, or when the move runs directly into a nearby resistance or support level that was not accounted for when the pattern was drawn. A rectangle breakout above resistance that immediately runs into a much stronger resistance level just above it, for example, can trap traders who acted on the pattern alone without checking what price levels sat just beyond the breakout point. Because false breakouts by definition happen after the trigger appears to fire, this is exactly why invalidation levels need to be set in advance rather than decided in the moment.

Low volume and thin liquidity

Patterns that form in thinly traded stocks, or during pre-market and after-hours sessions, are structurally less reliable because a small number of participants can move price disproportionately. A shape that looks like a clean triangle on light volume may simply reflect a handful of trades rather than a genuine shift in broad buyer or seller behavior, and the breakout, when regular-session liquidity returns, can behave very differently than the pattern implied. This is one reason experienced traders tend to weight patterns in liquid, actively traded names more heavily than the same shapes in illiquid tickers.

Earnings, macro news, and headline shocks

A chart pattern describes historical price behavior; it does not account for information that has not yet been released. An earnings report, a Fed decision, or an unexpected geopolitical headline can override a technical setup entirely, gapping price through a pattern's boundary, invalidation level, and target all at once. Every trader has experienced the moment when a major release hits, the market moves sharply, and there is a scramble to work out whether it is bullish or bearish for a position, which is the exact gap that headline-interpretation tools try to close; MRKT Edge's AI Market Headlines feature, for instance, is built to tell traders what a given story means for the specific assets they trade, such as EUR/USD, gold, the S&P 500, or Bitcoin. That kind of context does not make a pattern more or less valid on its own, but it is a reminder that a clean chart shape formed ahead of a scheduled catalyst deserves extra scrutiny, not blind confidence.

Timeframe conflicts

The same stock can show a bullish continuation pattern on a 15-minute chart while sitting inside a bearish reversal structure on the daily chart, and traders who only look at one timeframe can get whipsawed by the mismatch. There is no universal rule for which timeframe should win in a conflict, but most disciplined approaches involve picking a primary timeframe for the overall trade thesis and treating shorter-timeframe patterns as timing tools within that larger structure rather than as standalone signals. Ignoring this distinction, and trading every intraday shape as if it exists in isolation from the daily or weekly trend, is one of the more common ways beginners talk themselves into low-quality setups.

A simple workflow for using stock chart patterns

Recognizing a pattern is only the first step; using patterns productively requires a repeatable process for finding, checking, documenting, and later reviewing setups. This does not need to be complicated. A simple, consistent workflow reduces the chance that excitement over a visually appealing shape overrides the validation rules covered earlier in this guide.

A workable process generally includes:

Scanning a manageable watchlist for a small number of well-defined formations rather than trying to spot every named pattern on every chart.
Checking the prior trend and context before labeling anything, as covered in the validation framework above.
Documenting the setup, including boundaries, trigger, confirmation, invalidation, and target, before entering.
Managing the position against the predefined invalidation level rather than an emotional reaction to short-term price movement.
Reviewing the outcome afterward against the original plan, regardless of whether the trade was profitable.

The sections below expand on the scanning, documentation, and review stages specifically.

Scan for structure, not for every possible pattern

Trying to identify every pattern type on every chart, every day, is a recipe for overfitting noise into shapes that are not really there. A more sustainable approach is to pick a small set of formations, for example rectangles, flags, and head-and-shoulders variants, and become consistent at spotting and validating those specific structures before expanding to more subjective patterns like wedges or cup and handle formations. This mirrors the broader idea that stock chart patterns work by representing supply and demand dynamics on a chart, as CMC Markets frames it; narrowing your scan criteria makes it easier to judge whether that dynamic is genuinely present rather than pattern-matching on limited information.

Document the setup before entry

Writing down the specifics of a setup before entering forces the same discipline the validation framework describes, and it creates a record you can actually review later. A compact checklist works well for this:

Timeframe used for the pattern
Pattern name and category (continuation, reversal, or bilateral)
Anchor points used to draw boundaries
Trigger price and whether it was met on a closing basis
Confirmation input observed (volume, retest, moving average, or other)
Invalidation level and planned stop
Target level and the method used to calculate it (for example, a measured move)
Any relevant context, such as an upcoming earnings date or macro event

This checklist is not meant to slow down every decision with paperwork; it is meant to make the difference between an impulsive click and a planned trade visible, especially in hindsight.

Review the result after the trade or observation period

After a trade closes, or after the observation period for a pattern you chose not to trade ends, the review step asks whether the pattern held to the rules you defined for it, separate from whether the outcome was profitable. A pattern that triggered, got weak confirmation, and still worked is a different data point than one that triggered with strong confirmation and worked, even if both made money, and tracking that distinction over many instances is how a trader starts to learn which confirmation inputs actually matter for the setups they trade. Technical backtesting platforms such as TradingView, MetaTrader, and AmiBroker are built for testing price-based, technical strategies against historical data, according to MRKT Edge's backtesting feature page, which is a different exercise than the fundamental, event-driven backtesting MRKT Edge itself offers for testing how markets reacted to past macro releases across multi-asset history. Either kind of review, technical or fundamental, shares the same underlying purpose: replacing a gut feeling about "patterns that work" with a documented record of how specific setups actually performed.

How stock chart patterns fit with broader market context

Chart patterns are one input among several a trader can use, alongside volume, moving averages, news, and broader market or macro context. Treating a pattern as the sole basis for a decision ignores everything happening around the chart that a purely geometric read cannot capture. The two subsections below draw a practical distinction between using a pattern to time an entry and using it to validate a broader view, and describe situations where outside context should carry more weight than the pattern itself.

Patterns for execution timing versus thesis validation

There is an operational difference between using a chart pattern to time when you enter a position and using it to confirm a broader thesis you already hold for other reasons. In the first use, the pattern's trigger and confirmation are the primary decision inputs, and the trade largely stands or falls on whether the breakout holds. In the second use, the pattern is a supporting signal inside a larger view built from other evidence, such as a fundamental read on the stock, sector, or macro environment, and a failed pattern in that context is a reason to wait, not necessarily a reason to abandon the broader thesis. Mixing these two uses without realizing it, treating every pattern as if it should carry the full weight of a trade decision, is a common source of overtrading.

When context should override the pattern

Some conditions make a clean-looking pattern less actionable regardless of how well it satisfies the validation checklist. A scheduled earnings report or macro release sitting directly on top of a pattern's expected breakout window is one example, since the catalyst can move price through the pattern's structure for reasons that have nothing to do with the chart. Most traders open charts and look for setups without first asking what direction the macro evidence points for that market that day, as MRKT Edge's daily bias feature description frames the gap it is designed to address, combining several inputs into a single directional read before a trader looks at chart-level setups. Using a macro-driven read as context for how much weight to give a pattern signal, rather than treating chart geometry as a standalone decision tool, is one practical way to apply that idea without assuming any single input, technical or fundamental, is sufficient on its own.

Key terms in stock chart patterns

A short glossary of frequently used terms can make the rest of this guide, and most other technical-analysis material, easier to read without constant re-explanation. These terms recur across nearly every pattern discussed above, and understanding them precisely helps reduce ambiguity when you are describing or documenting a setup.

Neckline: the line connecting the troughs (in a head and shoulders) or peaks (in an inverse head and shoulders) that acts as the pattern's trigger level.
Apex: the point where a triangle's converging trendlines would eventually meet, often used as a rough marker for how much longer a triangle can consolidate before it must break.
Measured move: a target-setting method that projects the height of a pattern (such as a range or flagpole) from the breakout point to estimate a potential move.
Retest: a return to a broken support, resistance, or trendline level shortly after a breakout, often used as a secondary confirmation signal.
Pullback: a short-term move against the prevailing trend that does not necessarily invalidate the trend itself.
Throwback: a short-term move back toward a broken resistance level shortly after an upside breakout, similar in spirit to a retest but specifically associated with bullish breaks.
Invalidation: the price level or condition that, if reached, indicates the pattern's implied thesis has failed.
False breakout: a move beyond a pattern's boundary that initially looks like confirmation but reverses shortly afterward.

Keeping this vocabulary consistent in your own notes makes it easier to compare setups over time and to communicate clearly if you ever discuss a trade with someone else.

Bottom line

Stock chart patterns can help organize price action into recognizable structures, but their usefulness depends on more than spotting a familiar shape. A pattern is only as reliable as the trend context it sits in, the consistency of the boundaries drawn around it, the strength of its confirmation, and the discipline behind the invalidation level set before entry. Failures are common enough, through false breakouts, thin liquidity, news shocks, and timeframe conflicts, that treating any single pattern as a standalone signal is a risk in itself. Used carefully, as one documented, reviewed input alongside broader market and macro context, stock chart patterns become a workable part of a trading process rather than a shortcut that replaces one.